Ironically enough, the biggest challenge faced by people making scientific and technical presentations is their reluctance to follow the scientifically established principles of communication.
What are those rules? One of them is that the human mind is drawn to problems, puzzles, and mysteries.
Rather than seeking to capture the attention of the audience by making a case for the puzzling mystery of the topic at hand, most scientific and technical speakers simply begin with their objectives, methods and data.
This may be admirable science in some circles, but it is not effective communication because it fails to provide the context for the content.
Effective communication seeks to gather the attention of an audience by igniting curiosity and emotion, and only when it has done so can it pull the many human minds present in the same direction.
For instance, let’s say a locomotive is backing up to hook onto a long train of railroad cars. If it fails to connect, it cannot pull the train forward.
A speaker who does not connect with an audience has the same problem: He cannot pull his listeners forward unless he has somehow gotten his hook into them.
To sink the hook, a scientific or technical speaker must leave the narrow realm of his expertise and put it into broader context. He must make a case for the importance of the problem he is working on, or for the maddening slipperiness of the always- receding solution he seeks.
This is the skill of the storyteller, the weaver of tales, the painter of pictures that draws us in—deeper and deeper. This is the skill of the dramatist, whose opening scene makes us want to stay tuned, and whose subsequent scenes keep us asking the question, “Where’s this going? What’s going to happen? “
A doctor, researcher, or engineer can improve her outcomes by applying the scientifically established principles of communication.